close
Hucksters.net
Exposing spam, fraud, corruption, censorship, and propaganda

Brenda Diaz

Socialite / Female /

Brenda Diaz is a Socialite who is a citizen of , and has been associated with the following entities as either a significant contributor, participant, promoter, or beneficiary, according to our OSINT research:

Brands:

Groups:

Events:

Domains:

Education:
Subreddits:

Google Adsense:

Google Analytics:

Google Analytics (2):

Google Analytics (3):

Google Analytics (4):

Google Analytics (5):

Google Analytics (6):

Google Analytics (7):

Google Analytics (8):

Google Analytics (9):

Google Tag Manager:

Google Tag Manager (2):

Google Tag Manager (3):

Google Tag Manager (4):

Google Tag Manager (5):



Public references:

https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?Search_Arg=Bayside+Advisory+LLC&Search_Code=NALL&PID=vploQdXWK4NscL1EMchfSZnC5o8tY&SEQ=20220608162349&CNT=25&HIST=1

sold her “copyright” of 4 photos to Bayside Advisory LLC

 

 

 

The Curious Case Of Billionaire Brian Sheth, An Anonymous Tweeter, Copyright Law, Twitter, And Some Company That Barely Seems To Exist

For what it’s worth, it does appear that Bayside Advisory LLC, using a US Postal Service postal box based in Menlo Park, California, did in fact file a copyright registration for six photos after MoneyBags posted the tweets. The registration claims that two of the photos (registered as a “group”) were “published” in 2017 and the four others (also registered together as a group) were “published” in July of 2020. In those registrations, Bayside names Brenda Diaz as the photographer of all six photos. Notably, Bayside insists that protecting copyright is part of what it does:

 

Contrary to Twitter?s baseless conjecture, Bayside is a communications and strategic advisory firm that, among other things, advises and partners with creators, artists, and entrepreneurs to protect, promote, and champion creative expression. Bayside owns a catalog of photographs (the Photographs are only a small part of the catalog) to exploit for those purposes. What Twitter is attempting to do with its motion to quash is diminish the rights of copyright holders by forcing them to navigate the court system and fight diligently, and at great cost and expense, to get basic information about those who infringe their copyrights.

 

That would be a hell of a lot more compelling if… the two registrations at issue here weren’t the only two registrations for published works that Bayside Advisory has. Earlier this summer (many, many months later) Bayside Advisory did register two more groups of unpublished photographs, but the idea that these photos are “only a small part of its catalog” is, at the very least, not clearly seen in its copyright registration practices.

 

 

 

 

2020 Photos of Girl.

 

Type of Work: Entry not found.
Registration Number / Date: VA0002221602 / 2020-11-02
Application Title: 2020 Photos of Girl
Title: 2020 Photos of Girl. [Group registration of published photographs. 4 photographs. 2020-07-01 to 2020-07-31]
Description: 4 photographs : Electronic file (eService)
Copyright Claimant: Bayside Advisory, LLC, Transfer: By written agreement. Address: 655 Oak Grove Ave. #551, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, United States.
Date of Creation: 2020
Publication Date Range: 2020-07-01 to 2020-07-31
Nation of First Publication: United States
Authorship on Application: Brenda Diaz; Domicile: United States; Citizenship: United States. Authorship: photographs.
Rights and Permissions: Bayside Advisory, LLC, 655 Oak Grove Ave. #551, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, United States
Copyright Note: Regarding title information: Deposit contains complete list of titles that correspond to the individual photographs included in this group.
Regarding group registration: A group of published photographs may be registered on one application with one filing fee only under limited circumstances. ALL of the following are required: 1. All photographs (a) were created by the same author AND (b) are owned by the same copyright claimant AND (c) were published in the same calendar year AND 2. The group contains 750 photographs or less AND 3. A sequentially numbered list of photographs containing the title, file name and month of publication for each photograph included in the group must be uploaded along with other required application materials. The list must be submitted in an approved document format such as .XLS or .PDF. The file name for the numbered list must contain the title of the group and the Case Number assigned to the application.
Regarding group registration: Registration extends to corresponding photographs in contents titles and in deposit.
Photographs: Published in July 2020 (4 photographs): Plane 1, Plane 2, Bikini, Big B
Names: Diaz, Brenda
Bayside Advisory, LLC

 



Review this person (edit or delete anytime):

One thought on "Brenda Diaz"

  1. Jesse Nickles says:

    Who is this chick? Nobody seems to know besides Brian Sheth… some girl who was partying with his group and took photos of Brian chilling with sexy other ladies… so Brian got this brand new anonymous company “Bayside Advisory LLC” to literally purchase the copyright for these 4 photos from Brenda, pretending like they are a media firm (they’re not, just a fake company formed to buy those copyrights)

    The LLC only bought the copyrights AFTER they had tried to subpoena Twitter to ID a troll who posted said photos

    The real question is how the troll found the photos in the first place, and I”m guessing because he was spying on the social media of these chicks Brian Sheth was stupidly taking photos with

Leave a Reply

*The vast majority of people listed in this database are just “normal” business people, therefore no negative connotation is insinuated nor should misdeeds be assumed based on existing in our business directory. Our underlying goal is exposing misdeeds and fraud, but to accomplish this we often must first identity “honest” business people. This is because of things like similar names, impersonation, copyright infringement, and other reasons. Thus, the vast majority of people in our database are not being accused of anything shady. For this reason, profiles are now “noindexed” by default until comments exist on any given profile, since many of them are unnotable.

DISCLAIMER: ALL INFORMATION ON THIS WEBSITE WAS OBTAINED LEGALLY VIA PUBLIC RECORDS AND WEB PAGES. This public interest website functions as a transparency engine to expose relationships between individuals and entities (e.g. brands and organizations). Under no circumstances do we publish confidential data about an individual such as ID numbers, medical records, health status, or financial information, including contact details such as personal email addresses and phone numbers, residential addresses, or personal media (e.g. photos/videos). If you discover any such information on our website (including in public comments or reviews), please let us know so that it can be removed immediately. (This does not apply to business-related phone/email, office locations, or other contact information that was used as part of a spam/fraud/etc campaign.) We explicity discourage using this internet directory in any effort to harm or harass any individual or entity, regardless of the reason. We also do not accept or solicit payments or other forms of value in exchange for removing or altering pages that are published here. Anyone is allowed to register a free account on Hucksters.net and publish reviews at anytime, as long as they use their real name and abide by our Terms, as well as all relevant laws of the United States and any local jurisdictions. Reviews can be edited or deleted at anytime at the discretion of the review author, and we strongly encourage updating the content whenever appropriate (e.g. if no longer accurate, or if new information exists). Users are also allowed to review themselves. Any comments that do not include the author’s full (real) name will be deleted. By posting on this site (under your real name), you therefore take legal responsibility for your words, and you understand that other people might therefore choose to dispute the nature of your words in a relevant court of law (thus commenters shall not hide behind Section 230). Reviews should be relevant to the subject’s career and not mundane/personal events. We encourage honesty, humility, and good humor, whenever possible.

Common searches: owner, founder, ceo, boss, associate, whois, info, huckster, scammer, spammer, liar, true, reviews, experiences, reputation, before, known for, profile, deadname, real name, birth name, original name, who was, gender, beliefs, history, etc.

Be brave! Login now and report any spam, fraud, or censorship you have witnessed. If you don’t say something, then nothing changes.

Legal caution: we fight (and expose) all fraudulent DMCA+ takedown notices submitted against our website. Any agency, freelancer, or lawyer who is party to “takedown” fraud will be aggressively exposed by our team. Please do not assist the scumbags in our directory unless you’re willing to be publicly exposed, thank you.